Yesterday I explored a way how continuous customer interviews can become stale.
In a conversation that followed with fellow product geek Martha Malloy, a useful distinction came out: are these interviews customer listening, or product discovery?
Both types of conversations are useful—and at a glance, look identical—but they have different purposes.
Customer listening (often called “VOC”) is a good thing, and should happen on an ongoing basis. Listening interview questions tend to be more stable.
Product discovery interviews are different. These ongoing conversations are intended to drive something—outcomes (results). What we need to learn to make progress will be constantly changing as we try things, learn, and close gaps. These interview questions should be much more dynamic.
Listening is a monitoring tool (think of it as “qualitative product instrumentation”). But discovery? That’s about moving forward, making progress.
To be sure I understand the distinction here: could "listening" be stated as having no real agenda, and whatever comes up, comes up. While "discovery" is listening with an agenda towards a specific outcome (e.g. figuring out some new product or feature to build) - which is how we make progress. Do I have that right?